Why do they have a trial in “The Witcher” after the ball and conclave?
In the intense and suspenseful episode 5 of The Witcher's third season, we are immersed in the magical and politically charged atmosphere of the ball at Aretuza. A significant turning point arrives when Geralt and Yennefer, after uncovering evidence in Stregobor's study, accuse the mage of serious crimes. Yet, rather than resorting to immediate judgment or violent retaliation, the group agrees to hold an official trial after the ball and conclave. This agreement is not only surprising but crucially informative about the characters involved and the world they inhabit.
To understand the decision to hold a trial, one must first delve into the ethos that permeates the community of sorcerers and sorceresses in the Witcher universe. Mages in this realm are not solely powerful wielders of magic, but they also hold significant political sway and are entrenched in a sophisticated social order. They are renowned scholars, advisors to kings, and court wizards, making them instrumental in shaping the socio-political landscape of the Continent. Thus, accusations of criminal conduct against one of their own carry profound implications and repercussions.
By agreeing to a trial, the group emphasizes their commitment to due process and justice, despite the nature of the crime or the accused's standing. It sends a clear message that no individual is above the law, not even a respected and influential mage like Stregobor. This stance is significant, given that mages are typically seen as unaccountable due to their power and position. The decision marks a conscious attempt to challenge this perception and align the mage community with principles of justice and accountability.
In addition, the decision also provides fascinating insight into the characters' perspectives and priorities. Istredd, Triss, Tissaia, Artorius, and Vilgefortz, who are part of the decision-making process, demonstrate their political acumen and diplomatic skills. They are aware that handling such a situation requires delicacy and thoroughness. Any rash actions could destabilize the balance of power, incite conflict, and tarnish the reputation of their community.
It's worth mentioning that the decision also serves a strategic purpose. A trial gives them the chance to formally interrogate Stregobor, present the evidence in an organized manner, and possibly unravel more information about his alleged criminal activities. It could also expose any potential accomplices, thereby allowing them to root out corruption within their ranks more effectively.
Yennefer and Geralt's role in this decision also signals an important character evolution. Despite their past brushes with the law, their choice to favor a judicial proceeding over vigilante justice indicates their maturing perspectives. They're learning to navigate the political complexities of their world and are willing to operate within its structures for the greater good. Their commitment to justice, despite their personal sentiments and experiences with Stregobor, showcases their integrity and evolution as characters.
However, it's crucial to remember that this is still the world of The Witcher, where treachery and danger lurk in every corner. As we eagerly anticipate the trial, we must prepare for the inevitable twists and turns, betrayals and revelations that will surely come with it. The decision to hold a trial doesn't just represent a commitment to justice; it sets the stage for a gripping narrative arc that will undoubtedly shape the rest of the season.
In conclusion, the decision to hold an official trial after the ball and conclave is not just a plot point but a window into the complex dynamics of power, justice, and politics in the world of The Witcher. It showcases character growth and sets the stage for intriguing developments to come. As we wait with bated breath for the trial to unfold, we can only speculate about its outcomes and its far-reaching effects on the characters and the narrative trajectory of the season.
