Robert Jackson: 'We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.'

We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.

Robert Jackson's quote, "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final," holds a profound meaning that reflects the intricacies of human judgment and authority. At first glance, it suggests that the ultimate power and authority attributed to certain individuals or systems is not necessarily due to their infallibility, but rather to the position they hold as the final decision-makers. This quote reminds us that being the final authority does not make one infallible or immune to error, but rather it places them in a position of ultimate responsibility for making critical judgments.The straightforward interpretation of this quote brings to light an important aspect of leadership and decision-making processes. Often, individuals or structures that hold the final word on matters become elevated to a position of infallibility in the eyes of others. However, this perspective should be challenged, as being the final authority should not automatically imply an absence of error. Rather, it simply means that these individuals or systems have been entrusted with the responsibility of making critical decisions and judgments that others may rely upon.However, let us now delve into an unexpected philosophical concept that can further illuminate the depth of Jackson's quote. In exploring the ideas of skepticism and fallibilism, we can contrast them with the notion of finality and infallibility. Skepticism entails a questioning and doubting attitude towards knowledge and beliefs, while fallibilism acknowledges the possibility of error and recognizes the fallible nature of human judgment.Skepticism challenges the idea of finality and infallibility by probing the veracity of any declared ultimate authority. Skeptics argue that no one should be considered final in their decisions because absolute certainty is elusive and subjective. By embracing skepticism, we invite a healthy dose of doubt and critical thinking into our understanding of authority, questioning the infallibility that may be associated with the final decision-makers.Fallibilism, on the other hand, complements skepticism by emphasizing the inherent fallibility of human judgment. It stresses that even the most revered sources of knowledge and authority are subject to error due to the limits of human cognition and imperfect perception. Fallibilism prompts us to question and reconsider our assumptions about the infallibility of final authorities, reminding us that they too can make mistakes.Contrasting these philosophical concepts with the notion of finality and infallibility brings an added layer of complexity to Jackson's quote. It serves as a reminder that being the final authority does not guarantee truth or perfection, but it does come with the weighty responsibility of ensuring fairness, considering diverse perspectives, and mitigating the chances of errors.While skepticism and fallibilism urge us to question and challenge the notion of finality and infallibility, it is important to strike a balance. While complete skepticism can lead to never-ending doubt and hesitancy, and complete fallibilism can undermine confidence in any authority, acknowledging the limitations of human judgment is crucial. Recognizing this inherent fallibility leads to continual improvement, allowing final authorities to evolve and adapt in the face of new information and changing circumstances.In conclusion, Robert Jackson's quote, "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final," conveys a profound insight into the relationship between authority, fallibility, and the responsibility of decision-makers. It cautions against assuming infallibility based solely on the finality of a decision or position, emphasizing the need to critically evaluate and question authority. By introducing the philosophical concepts of skepticism and fallibilism, we further enrich our understanding of the quote, reminding us that no one should be exempt from scrutiny, and that our quest for knowledge and understanding should always be accompanied by a humble recognition of our fallible nature.