Richard Whately: 'To follow imperfect, uncertain, or corrupted traditions, in order to avoid erring in our own judgment, is but to exchange one danger for another.'
To follow imperfect, uncertain, or corrupted traditions, in order to avoid erring in our own judgment, is but to exchange one danger for another.
In his quote, Richard Whately brings to light the potential pitfalls of blindly following traditions as a means to safeguard ourselves from the possibility of making errors in judgment. To summarize the quote's meaning simply, Whately suggests that while it may be tempting to rely on imperfect or corrupted traditions to steer us away from fallacies, doing so merely exposes us to a different form of danger. This premise challenges us to question the unquestioned and consider the implications of adhering to traditions without critical thinking. However, it is through the introduction of an unexpected philosophical concept that we can further explore the depth of Whately's quote and unravel its significance.The unexpected philosophical concept that we will delve into is the notion of transcendence. Transcendence, at its core, refers to a surpassing or going beyond the ordinary limits of existence. It asks us to contemplate life beyond the mundane and linear perspective. By introducing this concept, we expand the realm of discussion and invite readers to explore the relationship between tradition, judgment, and the pursuit of a higher truth.When examining the contrast between following imperfect traditions and embracing transcendence, we discover intriguing parallels. Traditions, on one hand, can provide a sense of structure and guidance in our lives. They allow us to navigate through the complex tapestry of societal norms, shaping our values, beliefs, and customs. However, as Whately implies, relying solely on tradition for judgment can become a double-edged sword. Blindly accepting and following traditions without careful consideration may lead us down a path of conformity and stagnation.On the other hand, embracing transcendence encourages us to question the status quo and seek a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. It invites us to think beyond societal norms and explore the realms of creativity, curiosity, and philosophical inquiry. Transcendence allows us to transcend the limitations of conventionality, enabling us to broaden our perspectives and approach life's challenges with a fresh and open mind.In comparing these two concepts, we find that both have their merits and potential drawbacks. Traditions can provide stability and a sense of belonging, but they can also hinder personal growth and constrain our capacity for critical thinking. Transcendence, on the other hand, offers freedom and the potential for profound self-discovery, but can also lead to isolation and detachment from reality if taken to the extreme.To find a balance between the two, it is crucial to exercise discernment and conscious decision-making. Instead of blindly adhering to traditions or entirely abandoning them, we can leverage their wisdom while remaining open to new possibilities. By critically evaluating traditions and integrating them into ever-evolving frameworks, we can align ourselves with personal growth and intellectual exploration.In essence, Whately's quote reminds us of the dangers of clinging to traditions without engaging in our own critical judgment. However, by introducing the concept of transcendence, we expand the scope of the discussion and uncover the complexities of navigating tradition and pursuing a higher truth. Precarious as it may seem, finding a balance between tradition and transcendence can offer us a richer and more fulfilling existence, one that combines the wisdom of the past with the boundless potential of the future.