Pontius Pilate: 'What shall I do then with Jesus, which is called Christ?'

What shall I do then with Jesus, which is called Christ?

"What shall I do then with Jesus, which is called Christ?" This thought-provoking question, posed by Pontius Pilate, echoes through the ages with a weight of profound significance. It encapsulates the moral dilemma faced by Pilate upon encountering Jesus, the enigmatic figure who claimed to be the Messiah. The quote addresses the universal struggle to reckon with the transcendent, to confront profound choices that have deep-rooted implications. In exploring the essence of this quote, it is worth delving into an unexpected philosophical concept that adds depth and intrigue to this age-old debate - the concept of the existentialist absurd.The straightforward interpretation of Pilate's inquiry is rooted in the historical context of Jesus' trial and the wavering of Pilate's conscience. Aware of Jesus' immense influence, Pilate sought a solution that would appease both the Roman authorities and the angry Jewish crowd demanding crucifixion. Therefore, in asking what to do with Jesus, Pilate highlighted his overarching dilemma - how to navigate the intersection of political expediency, divine claims, and personal responsibility.However, beyond this historical narrative lies a vast realm of philosophical analysis that can shed a unique light on Pilate's question. The concept of the existentialist absurd, pioneered by philosophers such as Søren Kierkegaard and Albert Camus, examines human existence and the inherent tension between the search for meaning and the absurdity of existence. This perspective posits that life is fundamentally devoid of objective meaning or purpose, leaving humans to grapple with the existential void.In juxtaposing Pilate's question with the existentialist absurd, one can discern intriguing parallels. Pilate, confronted with Jesus, who claimed to be the embodiment of truth and salvation, faced an existential dilemma. On one hand, he had to exercise his political authority and fulfill the demands of the crowd. On the other, he recognized the inherent righteousness of Jesus and the enigmatic power he seemed to wield. Pilate symbolizes the human struggle to find meaning within the constraints of external pressures and the overwhelming absurdity of existence.Moreover, this comparison introduces an unexpected twist into the dialogue surrounding the quote. It encourages us to reflect on the choices we face in our lives when confronted with matters of ultimate significance. Confronting the existential void, we must grapple with our individual responsibility in deciding how to live authentically, even when faced with daunting choices that challenge our beliefs, values, or societal expectations.Pilate's question, albeit historically situated, resonates far beyond the context of his time. It invites us to dig deeper and ponder the very essence of existence, urging us to contemplate the complex interplay between personal agency, moral responsibility, and the pursuit of meaning. In a world often plagued by uncertainty, the enduring relevance of Pilate's query lies in its ability to provoke introspection and stimulate conversations about the deeper dimensions of life.Ultimately, the depth of Pontius Pilate's question, "What shall I do then with Jesus, which is called Christ?", lies not only in the historical events it refers to but also in the universal themes it encompasses. By introducing the concept of the existentialist absurd, we further enrich our understanding of this quote, encouraging us to confront our own existential dilemmas and search for meaning in a world that often appears inscrutable. In doing so, we navigate the intricate terrain of human existence, grappling with choices that have the power to shape our individual lives and the course of history itself.