Otto von Bismarck: 'The main thing is to make history, not to write it.'

The main thing is to make history, not to write it.

"The main thing is to make history, not to write it." These words of Otto von Bismarck capture the essence of his approach to life, politics, and the idea of leaving a lasting impact on the world. At first glance, this quote might seem straightforward - emphasizing the significance of taking action rather than merely documenting events. However, upon deeper exploration, an unexpected philosophical concept emerges, creating an intriguing dichotomy between active participation in history and the passive observation and recording of it.When Bismarck said, "The main thing is to make history, not to write it," he underscored the importance of being an agent of change. Bismarck, himself a prominent figure in European history, believed that taking decisive action and orchestrating events is far more significant than passively observing and recounting them after the fact. In other words, it is not enough to simply write or read about history; true impact lies in actively shaping the course of events.However, this quote also touches upon a philosophical notion that urges us to question the nature of reality, our role within it, and the significance of human agency. It introduces the concept that history itself is a narrative constructed by those who participate in it, and that our actions can have a profound effect on its course. This idea places importance not only on the actors themselves but also on the interpretation and portrayal of historical events. It encourages us to consider the complexities and subjectivity involved in the construction of history.In contrast, there is another perspective that acknowledges the value of writing history. Historians, scholars, and chroniclers play a crucial role in documenting events and providing future generations with valuable insights and knowledge. Their meticulous research, analysis, and synthesis of information create a foundation from which future action can be informed. Therefore, while Bismarck emphasizes the primacy of making history, it is equally essential to have a comprehensive understanding of the past as it informs the present and shapes the future.Despite the apparent contrast between making and writing history, these two concepts are not mutually exclusive. They exist in a symbiotic relationship, each dependent on the other for a complete understanding of historical events. The act of making history leads to written accounts, while those accounts inform and inspire further action. This interplay between action and observation magnifies the impact of human agency and enhances the collective understanding of our shared past.Ultimately, Bismarck's quote challenges us to be active participants in the world rather than passive bystanders. It urges us to recognize the transformative power of our actions and to strive for greatness in shaping the course of events. At the same time, it invites us to critically examine the narratives that emerge from these actions and to appreciate the role of historians in documenting and interpreting history.In conclusion, Otto von Bismarck's quote, "The main thing is to make history, not to write it," encapsulates the idea that active participation in the world is of utmost importance. It urges us to be agents of change and to embrace our role in shaping the course of history. However, it also raises philosophical questions about the construction of history and the role of observers and chroniclers. Both making and writing history are integral to our understanding of the past and the potential for progress in the future. By recognizing and appreciating the interplay between action and observation, we can strive for a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of our collective human experience.