Otto von Bismarck: 'Be polite; write diplomatically; even in a declaration of war one observes the rules of politeness.'

Be polite; write diplomatically; even in a declaration of war one observes the rules of politeness.

In his famous quote, Otto von Bismarck encapsulates the essence of courtesy and diplomacy even in the most trying of circumstances, such as declaring war. The quote highlights the significance of maintaining politeness and adhering to certain rules, even when engaging in acts of aggression. At first glance, it may seem counterintuitive to abide by such niceties during times of conflict. However, delving deeper, we can explore the philosophical concept of moral pragmatism, shedding light on the underlying motives behind Bismarck's insightful words.On a surface level, Bismarck's quote reminds us of the value of etiquette and maintaining polite discourse, even when the stakes are high. It reflects the view that civility should not be abandoned, regardless of the circumstances. Within the context of war, this can be perceived as an attempt to maintain a semblance of humanity amidst the chaos, limiting unnecessary harm caused by impulsive actions or heated words. By adhering to the rules of politeness, conflicting nations can ensure a slightly more civilized discourse, even when they find themselves at odds.Yet, the notion of being polite in a declaration of war raises fascinating questions when viewed through the lens of moral pragmatism. Moral pragmatism suggests that ethical decisions should be guided by analyzing the practical consequences or outcomes of a particular action, rather than relying solely on abstract principles. How then, does politeness in the face of war align with this ethical perspective?In exploring this concept, we must delve into the motives behind Bismarck's words. From a pragmatic standpoint, being polite during a declaration of war can serve strategic purposes. By projecting an image of civility, a nation engaging in conflict can potentially win over sympathetic allies, gain an advantage in public perception, or perhaps even deter aggression from other parties. In this context, politeness becomes a tool to manipulate public opinion and gain strategic leverage.Additionally, approaching war with civility may create a more conducive environment for potential negotiations or ceasefire agreements. By adhering to the rules of politeness, nations can lay the groundwork for future dialogue and open communication channels, even amidst hostilities. It allows room for future cooperation, demonstrating a commitment to peaceful resolution and a willingness to engage in diplomatic discourse.Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize the fine line between diplomatic politeness and disingenuousness. While politeness during war can serve practical purposes, it should not be used as a smokescreen to justify unethical actions or mask ulterior motives. True diplomacy requires an honest intent to find common ground and work towards resolving conflicts, rather than simply paying lip service to diplomatic conventions. In this sense, politeness in a declaration of war should neither be dismissed as mere superficiality nor as an excuse for unjust actions, but instead, it should be approached with a discerning eye.In conclusion, Otto von Bismarck's quote reminds us to hold on to politeness and diplomacy, even in the face of war. While this advice may initially seem contradictory, diving deeper into the realm of moral pragmatism reveals the underlying reasons behind such a standpoint. By adhering to the rules of politeness, nations can manipulate public opinion, gain strategic advantages, and foster an environment that allows for future dialogue and peaceful resolutions. However, this reliance on politeness must not be misconstrued as a justification for unethical actions or a guise for ulterior motives. The delicate balance of maintaining diplomacy amidst conflict requires a genuine commitment to understanding, cooperation, and the pursuit of a just resolution.