Johann Most: 'We need do no more than repeat: only under communism does the individual become himself and lead his own life.'

We need do no more than repeat: only under communism does the individual become himself and lead his own life.

In his quote, Johann Most argues that true individuality and personal fulfillment can only be achieved under communism. This statement is quite powerful, as it challenges the traditional notions of individualism and sheds light on the potential benefits of a collective society. Under communism, according to Most, individuals have the opportunity to truly become themselves and lead their own lives.At its core, this quote suggests that individuality flourishes in an environment where everyone's needs are met and where there is no exploitation or oppression. In a communist society, resources are shared equally, ensuring that everyone has access to the basic necessities of life. This lack of scarcity and competition opens up possibilities for individuals to pursue their passions, interests, and personal development.However, to truly grasp the significance and implication of Most's words, it is important to introduce an unexpected philosophical concept that adds depth and intrigue to the discussion. Enter existentialism – a philosophical ideology that emphasizes the individual's subjective experience and responsibility for their own existence.Existentialism, in contrast to communism, places heavy emphasis on personal freedom and the individual's ability to define their own meaning and purpose in life. Existentialist thinkers argue that true fulfillment can only be achieved through exercising one's autonomy and making authentic choices, even in the face of an uncertain and often chaotic world.At first glance, communism and existentialism may seem incompatible, as the former emphasizes equality and collective well-being, while the latter emphasizes personal freedom and individual responsibility. However, upon closer inspection, an interesting connection can be made.Both communism and existentialism share a common concern for human liberation. While communism aims to liberate individuals from the oppressive forces of capitalism and socio-economic inequality, existentialism seeks to liberate individuals from the constraints of societal expectations, norms, and existential angst. Both ideologies recognize the importance of individuals being able to fully develop and lead meaningful lives.In communism, the collective effort to build an egalitarian society provides individuals with a solid foundation from which they can explore their own passions and purpose. By removing the burdens of poverty, exploitation, and unfulfilling labor, communism creates a conducive environment for personal growth and self-actualization.On the other hand, existentialism reminds us that even within a communist society, individuals must actively engage with the choices and responsibilities that shape their existence. In a world where individual needs are met, individuals bear the weight of defining their own purpose and finding meaning in their lives. Personal freedom and individual agency become even more crucial under communism, as individuals are no longer constrained by external factors but are instead faced with the challenge of creating their own paths.In conclusion, Johann Most's quote highlights the potential of communism to provide individuals with the necessary conditions for personal fulfillment and self-expression. By emphasizing the collective well-being and removing the barriers of inequality, communism paves the way for individuals to truly become themselves and lead their own lives. However, an unexpected philosophical connection with existentialism reveals a fascinating interplay between personal freedom and collective liberation. While communism may provide the foundation for individual growth, existentialism reminds us that personal responsibility and active engagement remain essential elements in achieving true individuality and meaning under communism.