Franz Kafka: 'Start with what is right rather than what is acceptable.'

Start with what is right rather than what is acceptable.

In Franz Kafka's famous quote, "Start with what is right rather than what is acceptable," he challenges us to prioritize doing what is morally correct, rather than simply conforming to societal norms. This quote encourages us to question the standards and expectations imposed by society and embark on a path driven by our own values and principles. Its significance lies in its ability to inspire individuals to act with integrity, even if it means going against the grain. However, exploring this quote from a philosophical perspective opens up a realm of thought that delves into the concepts of subjective morality and cultural relativism.At first glance, Kafka's words seem straightforward and easily comprehensible: one should always choose what is ethically correct over what society deems acceptable. It urges us to evaluate our actions based on a personal moral compass rather than blindly following the judgments of others. By starting with what is right, we are taking a stand for our beliefs and aligning our actions with our values. This quote calls upon us to be courageous and steadfast in our convictions, even if they are unpopular or unconventional.Beyond the surface-level understanding, we can introduce the concept of subjective morality to offer a new twist to the discussion. Subjective morality suggests that right and wrong are not universal absolutes but rather subjective judgments that vary from person to person. According to this perspective, what one individual considers morally right may differ from someone else's viewpoint. Thus, the application of Kafka's quote becomes intriguingly complex. If morality can be subjective, how can we determine what is objectively right or wrong?Here, the concept of cultural relativism comes into play. Cultural relativism posits that moral principles are shaped by cultural context, meaning what is considered "right" may differ across various societies and cultures. The acceptance of certain moral standards by a society influences what is deemed "acceptable" within its cultural framework. This notion challenges Kafka's quote by suggesting that what is right in one culture might be unacceptable in another.However, while cultural relativism acknowledges the influence of cultural context on moral judgments, it does not negate the existence of universal ethical principles. Though societal norms may differ, there are fundamental ethical values such as fairness, compassion, and honesty that transcend cultural boundaries. Thus, Kafka's quote still holds relevance in asking individuals to prioritize what they believe to be morally right, irrespective of cultural influences.The essence of Kafka's quote lies in the tension between personal conviction and societal expectations. It is an invitation to embark on a journey of introspection, questioning the conventional norms imposed upon us. By challenging the acceptable and starting with what is right, we make a conscious decision to live a life that aligns with our core values.In conclusion, Kafka's quote invites us to navigate through the complexities of morality and societal expectations. While subjective morality and cultural relativism may complicate the notion of what is right and acceptable, it is crucial to remember that universal ethical principles exist. By prioritizing what we believe to be morally right, we transcend the boundaries of societal norms and foster personal growth and integrity. In a world where conformity often rules, embracing the idea of starting with what is right is a powerful reminder to stay true to ourselves and stand up for what we truly believe in.