Rebecca West: 'Any authentic work of art must start an argument between the artist and his audience.'

Any authentic work of art must start an argument between the artist and his audience.

In her thought-provoking statement, Rebecca West asserts that any genuine work of art should incite an argument between the artist and their audience. At first glance, this quote may be interpreted as a call for controversy and conflict within the realm of art. However, upon further reflection, it becomes apparent that West's words hold a deeper meaning and offer an unexpected philosophical concept to explore.Summarizing West's quote, it can be understood as an invitation for art to stir debate and elicit diverse perspectives. Rather than striving for agreement or conformity, an authentic work of art should challenge existing norms, beliefs, and values. By initiating a dialogue between the artist and the audience, this type of art opens up a space for critical thinking, reflection, and the reevaluation of established ideas. It encourages viewers to engage with and question the intentions, message, and execution of the artwork, fostering a deeper understanding and appreciation of the creative process.To further explore the significance of West's quote, it is pertinent to introduce the concept of moral relativism. This philosophical standpoint suggests that moral truths are not absolute but rather depend on individual perspectives and cultural contexts. Similarly, in the realm of art, the interpretation and reception of a piece may vary greatly among different viewers. This concept highlights the subjectivity of artistic experience and emphasizes the importance of diverse opinions and viewpoints.When an artwork engenders an argument, it embodies the essence of moral relativism. The artist presents their creation as a manifestation of their unique worldview, their perspective on society, or their personal struggles. Simultaneously, the audience perceives the artwork through the lens of their own beliefs, biases, and experiences. As a result, differing interpretations arise, leading to debates and discussions that enrich the understanding and appreciation of the work itself.Moreover, the inherent value of an argument lies not only in the divergent opinions it brings forth but also in the process of engagement and critical examination it provides. By encouraging conversation and debate, art serves as a catalyst for intellectual growth. It stimulates the development of individual perspectives, the expansion of knowledge, and the exploration of new ideas. In this way, the argument, born from a piece of authentic art, becomes a valuable tool for personal and societal advancement.However, it is crucial to recognize that the purpose of an argument within art is not to create conflict for conflict's sake or to inflame emotions unnecessarily. Rather, it is a means to disrupt complacency, challenge prevailing notions, and inspire introspection. It is through the collision of differing viewpoints that artists and audiences alike are compelled to confront their assumptions, biases, and limitations. Consequently, art becomes an agent of change, growth, and enlightenment.In conclusion, Rebecca West's quote, urging an argument between the artist and their audience, holds significant meaning in the realm of art. This call for debate and discourse does not seek to divide but rather to unite through diversity of thought and perspective. By embracing the philosophical concept of moral relativism, we gain a deeper understanding of the significance of arguments provoked by genuine art. Engaging in these conversations allows both artists and viewers to discover new insights, challenge preconceived notions, and foster intellectual growth. In this way, the argument arising from an authentic work of art becomes an invaluable catalyst for personal and societal transformation.