Peter Davison: 'I like poems that are little games.'

I like poems that are little games.

In his remark, "I like poems that are little games," Peter Davison captures the essence of his appreciation for a distinct type of poetry. The quote suggests that Davison is drawn to poems that possess an element of playfulness and intrigue, akin to a game. This preference highlights his inclination toward unconventional and imaginative forms of artistic expression. It also raises the question of why such "games" within poetry are considered significant and how they contribute to the overall experience of both the poet and the reader.At first glance, the concept of poetry as a game might seem trivial or inconsequential. However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the use of games within poetry not only adds an element of entertainment but also holds deeper philosophical implications. By introducing unexpected philosophical concepts into the discussion, we can explore the multifaceted nature of poems as little games.One way to understand the significance of this quote is by considering poetry as a means of exploring and reflecting upon the human condition. Poems often encapsulate the complexities of existence, prompting readers to delve into their own thoughts and feelings. By framing these explorations as "little games," Davison suggests that poetry provides a structured space for contemplation and invites readers to actively participate in deciphering its meaning.Poetry, like games, requires a level of engagement and interaction from its audience. Just as players immerse themselves in the rules and challenges of a game, readers of poetic "games" must actively navigate the linguistic terrain laid out before them. This transformative process of decoding and interpreting words becomes an immersive experience where readers unlock the hidden depths and intentions of the poet.Moreover, games and poetry share the element of surprise. Both can evoke a sense of wonder and discovery by presenting unexpected twists or by subverting traditional structures. In poems that resemble games, poets often employ inventive wordplay, unusual forms, or unexpected juxtapositions, challenging readers' preconceptions and pushing the boundaries of language. The result is an imaginative journey filled with enchantment and intellectual stimulation, akin to solving a puzzle or unraveling a captivating mystery.By viewing poetry as a game, we can also shed light on the inherently subjective nature of interpretation. Just as different players may approach a game with varying strategies and outcomes, each reader brings their own unique perspective and background to the act of reading a poem. The open-endedness of poetry allows for personal interpretation and encourages readers to engage with their own sensibilities, thus making the experience of each poem a highly individualized endeavor.In contrast, traditional notions of poetry often prioritize adherence to strict structural frameworks and predetermined meaning. Poetic "games" challenge these conventions by inverting expectations and enabling a more interactive and playful approach. They invite participation, spark creativity, and encourage readers to actively explore the boundaries of language and meaning.In conclusion, Peter Davison's quote, "I like poems that are little games," not only expresses a personal affinity for playful and imaginative poetry but also unveils a profound perspective on the nature of literary engagement. By considering poetry as a game, we can appreciate the transformative power of language and the dynamic relationship between poet and reader. Poetry's inherent capacity to simultaneously entertain, challenge, and provoke introspection is enriched when approached as a creative and interactive endeavor. Thus, the quote inspires us to explore the endless possibilities that emerge when poems become little games.