Jonah Goldberg: 'I think as - all in all, it's better to have a cool president than a not cool president.'

I think as - all in all, it's better to have a cool president than a not cool president.

In Jonah Goldberg's quote, "I think as - all in all, it's better to have a cool president than a not cool president," a straightforward interpretation would suggest that having a president who is considered cool or popular is more preferable than one who is not. While this statement may seem simplistic on the surface, it actually invites us to delve deeper into the broader implications of charisma, personality, and leadership. By introducing an unexpected philosophical concept, such as the ancient Greek idea of the "golden mean," we can explore the complex interplay between coolness, effectiveness, and the responsibility that comes with being a leader.The idea of having a cool president might stem from the desire for someone relatable and approachable—a leader who exudes confidence and inspires others. Coolness, in this context, could be seen as having an intrinsic appeal that helps a president connect with the public. A cool leader may possess the ability to remain calm under pressure, articulate ideas effectively, and showcase exuberance in their work.On the other hand, a not cool president might refer to someone who lacks the personal charm or charisma typically associated with coolness. This could be due to a reserved or socially awkward personality, a lack of a flashy public image, or an inability to connect with a wide range of people. While not being cool does not necessarily equate to incompetence, it may hinder a president's ability to effectively communicate and inspire trust among the populace.However, it is crucial to consider that coolness alone should not be the sole criterion for evaluating a president's effectiveness. Just as too much coolness can veer into arrogance or superficiality, an ideal leader should possess a balanced combination of coolness and substance. This is where the concept of the golden mean becomes relevant.The golden mean, espoused by ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, suggests that the virtue lies in finding a balanced middle ground between extremes. In the context of presidential leadership, this means striking a harmony between being cool and being competent. A president who is too cool might prioritize style over substance, potentially neglecting critical issues or making impulsive decisions for the sake of popularity. Conversely, a leader who lacks coolness entirely might struggle to engage the public or inspire confidence, even if they possess considerable competence.Therefore, the ideal president would embody the golden mean, displaying both coolness and substance in their actions and decisions. Such an individual would possess the charisma and relatability necessary to connect with the public and inspire trust, alongside the competence and depth of knowledge required to address complex challenges.By framing the quote in the context of the golden mean, we can evaluate the importance of coolness in presidential leadership without overlooking the need for substance. Striving for a balanced approach highlights the significance of authenticity, integrity, and the ability to effectively communicate ideas and policies.Ultimately, while having a cool president may create a positive aura and garner popularity, it is essential not to overlook the considerable weight of responsibility that comes with leadership. The coolness factor should not be a substitute for competence, and a leader who excellently embodies the golden mean between coolness and substance is in the best position to navigate the complexities of governance and effectively serve the interests of the people.In conclusion, Jonah Goldberg's quote reminds us of the significance of coolness in a president, acknowledging its potential appeal and ability to connect with the public. However, it also serves as a catalyst for contemplating the broader implications of leadership and the importance of striking a balance between coolness and substance. By embracing the concept of the golden mean, we can consider the interplay between charisma, competence, and responsible leadership in evaluating the qualities of an effective president.