Eric Alterman: 'For the past eight years, the right has been better at working the refs. Now the left is learning how to play the game.'

For the past eight years, the right has been better at working the refs. Now the left is learning how to play the game.

The quote by Eric Alterman, 'For the past eight years, the right has been better at working the refs. Now the left is learning how to play the game,' encapsulates a significant shift in the political landscape. At first glance, it suggests that the right-wing has been more adept at manipulating public opinion and influencing the media, while the left has lagged behind. However, delving deeper into the quote, it becomes clear that it also speaks to a broader philosophical concept - the art of persuasion and the power dynamics involved in it.On the surface, Alterman's quote highlights the asymmetrical nature of political discourse. For years, the conservative right has been more successful in shaping narratives and controlling the conversation. This ability to "work the refs" - a term borrowed from sports - refers to the strategic pressure exerted on individuals or institutions to tilt the playing field in favor of one's own agenda. In the context of politics, it implies influencing the media and public sentiment to create an advantageous environment for a particular ideology or political party.But what does it mean for the left to "learn how to play the game"? Beyond the straightforward interpretation, this phrase also points to an underlying philosophical shift. The left, traditionally associated with progressive values and a focus on social justice, has often held a skepticism toward power games and manipulation. However, this quote hints at a recognition that persuasion and influence are necessary tools in today's complex political landscape.The unexpected philosophical concept that emerges from Alterman's quote is the tension between authenticity and effectiveness. On one hand, there is an inherent desire for political discourse to be honest, transparent, and focused on substantive issues. On the other hand, there is a realization that to effectively advocate for one's beliefs, it is essential to master the art of persuasion and play the game of influencing public opinion.This tension between authenticity and effectiveness presents a fascinating dichotomy for both the left and the right. The right, long accustomed to working the refs, may sometimes sacrifice authenticity for the sake of influencing the narrative. While their tactics have been effective in the short term, they are not immune to accusations of dishonesty and manipulating the discourse. The left, on the other hand, has arguably prioritized authenticity and substance, often assuming that the sheer strength of their ideas should be enough to sway public opinion. However, the recent recognition of the need to "play the game" suggests that they are beginning to reckon with the reality that affective communication and persuasion strategies are crucial for the success of their agenda.In the face of increasing polarization and the distortion of truth in political debates, there is a growing imperative for the left to find a delicate balance between playing the game and remaining true to their core values. It necessitates a nuanced approach that combines strategic persuasion with an unwavering commitment to principles of fairness, justice, and democratic ideals.Ultimately, Alterman's quote serves as a call to action for the left to embrace the art of persuasion while also maintaining a high standard of integrity. It illuminates the need for a new paradigm that redefines what it means to "play the game" without compromising authenticity and ethical values. As the left continues to navigate this dynamic political landscape, mastering the art of persuasion will empower them to challenge the dominant narratives, potentially leading to a more inclusive and equitable society.