Corey Feldman: 'It's funny I actually made poorer decisions when I sobered up then when I was screwed up.'

It's funny I actually made poorer decisions when I sobered up then when I was screwed up.

In Corey Feldman's quote, "It's funny I actually made poorer decisions when I sobered up than when I was screwed up," there is a straightforward notion of surprise and irony. At first glance, one might be perplexed by this statement. How is it possible that someone could make worse choices when they are clear-headed and free from the influence of substances? However, beneath the surface, there lies an unexpected philosophical concept that offers an interesting perspective on decision-making and the complexities of human behavior.The straightforward interpretation of Feldman's quote suggests that he made more regrettable decisions when he was sober compared to when he was under the influence of substances. This may seem counterintuitive, acknowledging the commonly accepted belief that being sober promotes rational thinking and responsible decision-making. Yet, Feldman's quote implies that sobriety, while initially perceived as beneficial, might have somehow led him astray. It invites us to question the assumptions we hold about the relationship between clarity of mind and sound judgment.Delving deeper into this quote, we encounter a contrasting philosophical concept that challenges the conventional wisdom – the idea that being "screwed up" might have its own unique value in decision-making. While intoxication can certainly impair judgment, it might also offer an alternative lens through which to view situations, unencumbered by societal expectations or inhibitions. This alternate state of mind could give rise to more spontaneous, unconventional, and perhaps even creative choices.Consider the scenario of an artist or musician who finds inspiration and creativity in the depths of their altered consciousness. It is not uncommon for many celebrated minds throughout history to have created their best works while under the influence of certain substances. This is not to endorse substance abuse, but rather to acknowledge the possibility that unconventional thinking brought about by intoxication can have its own distinctive impact on decision-making.In light of this contrast, the quote poses intriguing questions about the nature of decision-making itself. Is there a single "correct" path when it comes to choices? Can we truly define what constitutes a good or bad decision, or does it depend on the individual's unique circumstances and desired outcomes? And if we acknowledge the potential merits of being "screwed up" in making decisions, should we reconsider our judgments on those who make choices in altered states?Ultimately, Corey Feldman's quote challenges our preconceived notions about decision-making and highlights the complexity of human behavior. It suggests that the interplay between sobriety and altered states of consciousness can yield surprising outcomes when it comes to choices. As we reflect on this unexpected philosophical concept, we are invited to reconsider the one-size-fits-all approach to decision-making, fostering a greater understanding and acceptance of the diverse paths individuals may take in navigating their lives.