Marine Le Pen: 'I think 2017 is going to be the year of the grand return of the nation-state, the control of borders and currencies.'

I think 2017 is going to be the year of the grand return of the nation-state, the control of borders and currencies.

In her statement, Marine Le Pen captures the essence of a shifting global landscape and predicts that 2017 will mark the resurgence of the nation-state with a renewed focus on border control and currency management. This quote reflects Le Pen's political ideology and her belief in the importance of sovereignty and national identity. At its core, the statement highlights the growing prominence of nationalism and the desire to regain control over the geographical and economic boundaries of a country.The concept of nation-states, with sovereign control over their borders and currencies, has been a foundational principle in international relations for centuries. It represents the idea that each country should have the autonomy to define its own policies, regulate its borders, and manage its economic affairs. However, in recent years, factors such as globalization, regional integration, and the rise of supranational institutions have challenged the traditional significance of the nation-state.To delve deeper into the subject, let us introduce an unexpected philosophical concept - cosmopolitanism. Cosmopolitanism argues for a global perspective that transcends national boundaries, promoting the idea that all individuals belong to a single community that encompasses the entire world. This philosophical framework emphasizes human interconnectedness and advocates for the elimination of divisions based on nationality.At first glance, the ideology of the nation-state and cosmopolitanism seem inherently opposed. While the former emphasizes the importance of borders, sovereignty, and national identity, the latter promotes the idea of a borderless world where national distinctions hold little significance. However, by examining these concepts side by side, we can extract valuable insights into the complexities of identity, belonging, and the challenges faced in an increasingly interconnected world.It is essential to understand that the resurgence of the nation-state, as envisioned by Le Pen, does not necessarily negate the principles of cosmopolitanism. The two can coexist in a nuanced manner that acknowledges the importance of both collective national identities and the interconnectedness of humanity. The key lies in striking a balance between national pride and a global perspective that transcends borders.In the pursuit of such a balance, it is crucial to recognize the potential dangers inherent in an extreme manifestation of either ideology. A hyper-focused obsession with the nation-state can lead to exclusionary politics, xenophobia, and a narrow-minded view of the world. On the other hand, an excessive emphasis on cosmopolitanism may downplay the value of cultural diversity, erode individual national identities, and undermine the sense of community within a country.As we navigate the complexities of our increasingly globalized world, it is essential to remember that progress lies not in the abandonment of one ideology for the other but in their harmonious integration. The grand return of the nation-state should not be seen as a rejection of cosmopolitan ideals but rather as an opportunity to redefine and strengthen the meaning of a nation in the global context.In conclusion, Marine Le Pen's quote captures a visionary perspective on the changing dynamics of the global landscape. The resurgence of the nation-state, with its focus on borders and currencies, suggests a renewed sense of national identity and sovereignty. However, it is important to approach this concept with an open mind and consider the value of cosmopolitanism as well. By finding a balance between these ideologies, we can navigate the challenges posed by an interconnected world while safeguarding individual national identities and promoting global cooperation.