Gustave Flaubert: 'One can be the master of what one does, but never of what one feels.'

One can be the master of what one does, but never of what one feels.

The quote by Gustave Flaubert, "One can be the master of what one does, but never of what one feels," encapsulates a profound truth about human nature and the limits of our control. In a straightforward sense, the quote suggests that while we may have mastery over our actions and decisions, our innermost emotions and feelings are elusive and beyond our complete command. This recognition holds great significance and prompts us to delve deeper into the complexities of the human psyche.To enrich our understanding of Flaubert's quote, let us explore the philosophical concept of existentialism. According to existentialism, human existence is characterized by a fundamental tension between freedom and constraint. Jean-Paul Sartre, a prominent existential thinker, argues that our actions are products of our freedom to choose, enabling us to take control and responsibility for our deeds. However, with regards to our emotions, existentialism takes a slightly different stance.Existentialism posits that emotions, such as despair, angst, or joy, arise spontaneously and independently of our will. They emerge from our subjective engagement with the world, our encounters with others, and the unpredictable nature of existence. In this light, emotions become akin to forces that act upon us, influencing our perception and coloring our experiences. While we can shape our actions through rational decision-making and conscious effort, our emotions remain elusive, shaped by a myriad of factors beyond our immediate control.Flaubert's quote resonates with existentialist philosophy, emphasizing the distinction between the mastery of actions and the inherent unpredictability of emotions. It reminds us that although we may meticulously plan our actions and meticulously execute them, we cannot manipulate our feelings with the same degree of precision. Our emotions are a complex interplay of conscious and subconscious processes, influenced by external circumstances, past experiences, and individual predispositions.However, acknowledging the limitations of our control over emotions does not imply resignation or a lack of agency. Instead, it invites us to cultivate self-awareness and engage in a more compassionate relationship with ourselves. Recognizing the ebb and flow of emotions as an integral part of the human experience, we can learn to navigate their unpredictable nature with grace and acceptance.Moreover, this quote invites us to consider the profound impact of emotions on our lives. Our feelings, though beyond complete control, shape our relationships, decisions, and sense of fulfillment. They add depth and richness to our experiences, allowing us to connect with others on a deeper level and experience the full spectrum of human existence.Finally, understanding the distinction between actions and emotions calls for a sense of humility in how we judge ourselves and others. Recognizing that emotions are not a direct reflection of personal character but a complex interplay of internal and external factors enables us to empathize with others and genuinely understand the depths of human complexity.In conclusion, Gustave Flaubert's quote invites us to explore the intricacies of human nature by highlighting the distinction between the mastery of actions and the elusiveness of emotions. This quote resonates with the philosophy of existentialism, emphasizing the fundamental tension between freedom and constraint. By recognizing the inherent limits of our control over emotions, we can foster self-awareness, compassion, and a deeper understanding of the human experience. Ultimately, this understanding allows us to embrace the unpredictability of emotions and navigate their impact on our lives with grace and authenticity.