John Selden: 'In quoting of books, quote such authors as are usually read; others you may read for your own satisfaction, but not name them.'

In quoting of books, quote such authors as are usually read; others you may read for your own satisfaction, but not name them.

In his quote, John Selden, the renowned English jurist and scholar, offers valuable advice on the art of quoting books. He suggests that when citing authors, it is preferable to quote those whose works are widely read, as they carry a certain weight and credibility in the eyes of readers. On the other hand, he proposes that we may explore and read other authors for our own personal enjoyment and enlightenment, but refrain from mentioning them explicitly in our quotes. This seemingly simple recommendation holds deeper implications and raises questions about the nature of knowledge, perception, and the value of literature.At first glance, Selden's quote highlights the pragmatic approach to the act of quoting. By encouraging individuals to reference well-known authors, he acknowledges the power of recognition and familiarity in effectively conveying a point. Quoting established and widely read authors helps establish a connection with readers, enabling them to engage with the ideas presented more readily. Moreover, such authors often carry a certain authority, as their works have been tested and recognized by the collective wisdom of generations. By aligning oneself with acclaimed authors, one is more likely to gain the recognition and respect of readers.However, beneath this practical surface lies a philosophical concept that challenges our perception of literature and knowledge. Selden subtly implies that the value of literature extends beyond popularity or societal recognition. While the works of well-regarded authors may be considered more valuable or influential, he invites us to explore the vast realm of lesser-known authors. He recognizes that personal satisfaction and intellectual growth can be found not only within the confines of popular literature but also in the hidden gems of lesser-known authors.This concept raises the question of how we measure the worth of literature and the factors that contribute to its significance. Could it be that the obscure and overlooked authors possess unique insights, perspectives, or writing styles that enrich our understanding of the world? By not explicitly mentioning these authors in our quotes, Selden implies that the value of a book should not be solely determined by its author's popularity, but rather by its inherent qualities and the impact it has on readers.Furthermore, Selden's quote subtly challenges our perception of the collective wisdom and the power dynamics within the literary world. It suggests that there is an underlying bias towards certain authors, which may limit our exposure to alternative perspectives. By deliberately reading and enjoying lesser-known authors without explicitly quoting them, we can challenge this established hierarchy and broaden our horizons. In doing so, we recognize that the act of reading is not merely a passive consumption of information but an active engagement with diverse voices and ideas.In conclusion, John Selden's quote offers both practical advice on quoting books and a deeper philosophical perspective on the nature of literature and knowledge. While he emphasizes the importance of quoting well-known authors for credibility and recognition, he also encourages us to explore and find personal satisfaction in the works of lesser-known authors. By not explicitly naming these authors, he challenges our perception of literary value, power dynamics, and the breadth of knowledge. Ultimately, his quote reminds us that in the pursuit of wisdom, it is equally important to tread the well-worn paths of popular literature and to venture into uncharted territories to discover hidden treasures.