Emily Watson: 'In my early career I was like a goldfish. Rejection didn't affect me; I'd just forget how bad it was and keep going back for more.'

In my early career I was like a goldfish. Rejection didn't affect me; I'd just forget how bad it was and keep going back for more.

In her quote, Emily Watson, a renowned actress, reflects on her early career and compares herself to a goldfish. She highlights her ability to brush off rejection, describing how it didn't affect her emotionally, leading her to persistently pursue her dreams. On a straightforward level, Watson's quote embodies a determined and resilient mindset, focusing on the importance of perseverance in the face of adversity. However, let's take a philosophical approach and introduce the concept of existentialism to explore the deeper implications of her words.Existentialism, a philosophical perspective developed in the 20th century, delves into the meaning and purpose of human existence. It emphasizes individual agency and the significance of our choices in creating a meaningful life. Drawing from this philosophy, we can explore how Watson's ability to forget past rejections and forge ahead represents a fundamental aspect of the human condition – the ability to reset and keep going despite setbacks.The goldfish analogy becomes particularly intriguing in the context of existentialism. Just as a goldfish continuously swims in circles within its confined bowl, seemingly unbothered by its repetitive existence, Watson likens herself to the resilient fish by effectively resetting after each rejection. Here, the goldfish represents the human capacity to detach from the past, adapt, and embark on new endeavors.While existentialism often delves into the complexities of existence, Watson's quote reminds us that simplicity can hold great wisdom. By forgetting the pain and negative experiences, her approach allows for renewed optimism and the pursuit of future opportunities. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that not everyone possesses this innate ability to move on easily.In pondering Watson's quote more deeply, we can consider the psychological implications of this 'goldfish' mentality. Are certain people naturally predisposed to resilience, or is it a learned skill? Is it an inherent trait or a coping mechanism born out of necessity? These questions raise interesting points and emphasize the importance of understanding our own capacity for resilience in navigating the inherent challenges of life.Watson's words also present a commendable perspective on personal growth. By continuously returning for more, she demonstrates a drive to learn and develop her talent. This growth mindset aligns with the existentialist belief that self-awareness, self-improvement, and striving for excellence are paramount in leading a fulfilling life.In contrast, one might argue that there is value in acknowledging and learning from past rejections rather than simply forgetting them. Reflecting on setbacks can provide valuable lessons and insights for personal and professional growth. By embracing rejection as a part of the journey instead of disconnecting from it, individuals may cultivate a more holistic approach to their pursuits.Ultimately, Emily Watson's quote, while straightforward, offers an opportunity to delve into the philosophical concept of existentialism. By comparing herself to a goldfish and highlighting her ability to forget past rejections, she exemplifies the human capacity for resilience and adaptability. However, it is important to recognize that resilience is not a one-size-fits-all trait, and there are alternative approaches to handling rejection that may foster personal growth in different ways. Embracing our own unique strengths and weaknesses, while being mindful of the lessons that rejection can teach us, allows us to navigate the ever-changing currents of life with grace and purpose.

Previous
Previous

Emily Watson: 'I was a normal, rather dutiful child. I didn't even rebel as a teenager.'

Next
Next

Alexander Cockburn: 'In its attempt to crush the Black Panthers, the FBI engineered frequent arrests on the flimsiest of pretexts.'