Edward Hall: 'We have cut the text, but what remains are Shakespeare's words.'

We have cut the text, but what remains are Shakespeare's words.

In the quote by Edward Hall, "We have cut the text, but what remains are Shakespeare's words," the meaning is relatively straightforward. It suggests that despite any editing or modifications made to the original text, the essence of Shakespeare's words still remains within the work. This quote highlights the significance of Shakespeare's language and how it continues to hold value even when the original context has been altered.On a surface level, this quote emphasizes the enduring power and impact of Shakespeare's writing. It suggests that regardless of any changes or adaptations made to his plays, the intrinsic brilliance of his words remains intact. This notion is particularly relevant when it comes to adapting Shakespeare's works to contemporary settings, translating them into different languages, or even abridging them for certain performances or productions. It assures us that although elements of the text may have been modified, the essence of Shakespeare's language still shines through.However, let's delve deeper into this quote and introduce an unexpected and thought-provoking philosophical concept – the nature of words themselves. While Hall's quote stresses the resilience of Shakespeare's words, we can ponder the idea that words transcend their initial context and become vessels of meaning on their own, detached from the author's intentions or the surrounding narrative.Words possess the extraordinary ability to evoke emotions, convey ideas, and build new worlds in the minds of readers or audience members. In this light, Shakespeare's words take on a life of their own, capable of resonating with individuals in unique and personal ways. When we consider this perspective, it becomes apparent that cutting the text or altering the context might not dilute the impact of Shakespeare's words. Instead, it may present an opportunity for those words to take on new forms of expression and relevance.Moreover, the concept of "Shakespeare's words" invites us to ponder the broader scope of literary works throughout history. It prompts us to question whether it is the author's original vision or the words themselves that truly hold lasting significance. Are the words of a renowned playwright like Shakespeare powerful because of their creator's genius, or do they possess an inherent strength that remains independent of their origin?This philosophical exploration leads us to contemplate the interplay between creator and creation, suggesting that while the author may provide the initial spark, it is the words themselves that ignite the imagination of readers and transcend time and space. Whether it is William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, or any other literary luminary, their words possess an intangible power that resonates across generations.In essence, Edward Hall's quote, "We have cut the text, but what remains are Shakespeare's words," underscores the enduring influence of Shakespeare's language. It acknowledges that even when the original context may be altered, the essence and impact of his words persist. However, by introducing the philosophical idea of words transcending their origins, we are encouraged to consider the independent power of language and the potential for words to ignite inspiration and provoke deep thought. Through this juxtaposition, we arrive at a more nuanced understanding of the quote's significance, emphasizing Shakespeare's words as both a product of the playwright's genius and an entity capable of forging its own path through time and human consciousness.

Previous
Previous

Jacob Bronowski: 'No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power.'

Next
Next

Edward Hall: 'We felt that although they were patchy, there was a tremendous political energy in the Henry plays.'