Thomas Sowell: 'The most basic question is not what is best, but who shall decide what is best.'

The most basic question is not what is best, but who shall decide what is best.

"The most basic question is not what is best, but who shall decide what is best." - Thomas SowellThis thought-provoking quote by Thomas Sowell encapsulates the essence of a fundamental debate in society - the question of who should hold the power to determine what is best for all. It challenges the traditional notion of finding the best solution and instead compels us to reflect on the authority granted to individuals or institutions in making these decisions. In a straightforward interpretation, Sowell highlights the importance of recognizing the significance of the decision-making process rather than just focusing on the desired outcome.However, to delve deeper into this concept and explore an unexpected philosophical perspective, let us consider the principles of existentialism. Existentialism is a philosophy that emphasizes individual freedom, responsibility, and the importance of personal choice in the face of an uncertain and potentially meaningless world. It suggests that individuals have the power and autonomy to determine their own values and goals, rather than relying on external sources to define what is good or right.From an existentialist standpoint, when it comes to deciding what is best, the individual should play a central role in the decision-making process. This perspective aligns with Sowell's assertion that it is the "who" rather than the "what" that holds significance. Existentialism emphasizes the importance of personal freedom and encourages individuals to critically assess various options, consider their own unique experiences, and make decisions based on their own authentic beliefs and values.Contrasting this with more authoritarian ideologies, such as utilitarianism or paternalism, where decision-making power is placed in the hands of an elite few or societal institutions, existentialism challenges the notion that there is a one-size-fits-all solution that can be determined by others. It recognizes the diversity of human experiences and acknowledges that what may be best for one person may not necessarily be best for another.This inference opens up a broader discussion about the implications of centralized decision-making. When power lies solely in the hands of a select few, there is a risk of disregarding the perspectives and needs of the larger population. By recognizing the importance of individual agency and empowering individuals to participate in the decision-making process, we can ensure a more inclusive and democratic society.Furthermore, embracing a philosophy that values personal choice and responsibility encourages individuals to engage in critical thinking, self-reflection, and self-expression. It fosters a culture of active citizenship, enabling people to exercise their rights, voice their opinions, and contribute to shaping collective decisions. In this way, empowering individuals to decide what is best for themselves and their communities can lead to a vibrant and flourishing society.To conclude, Thomas Sowell's quote serves as a catalyst for introspection, encouraging us to question and challenge the authority of decision-makers. By introducing the philosophical concepts of existentialism, we are reminded of the importance of individual agency in determining what is best. Contrasting this perspective with more authoritarian ideologies, we find that giving power to the people allows for a more inclusive and democratic society that values diverse experiences and encourages active citizen participation. Ultimately, the question of who shall decide what is best is not just a philosophical quandary but a practical consideration that shapes our society and its future.