Shankar Mahadevan: 'There are two kinds of music: good music and bad music. Both are and will continue to co-exist.'

There are two kinds of music: good music and bad music. Both are and will continue to co-exist.

In the world of music, the opinions and preferences of individuals can vary greatly. Some might have an affinity for melodies that have stood the test of time, while others might gravitate towards experimental sounds that push the boundaries of what music can be. In this intricate ecosystem of musical preferences, Shankar Mahadevan, the renowned Indian composer and singer, once stated, "There are two kinds of music: good music and bad music. Both are and will continue to co-exist." This quote encapsulates the idea that music, like any art form, is subjective, and what one person perceives as good may not resonate with another. It highlights the importance of embracing the diversity and multitude of musical expressions that exist in the world.At first glance, Mahadevan's quote may seem simplistic or even obvious. After all, it is not uncommon for people to have differing tastes in music. However, beneath its surface lies a profound philosophical concept that can ignite our imagination and spark introspection. It prompts us to consider the role of subjective perception, the power of individual experiences, and the ever-expanding boundaries of creative expression.Considering the quote in a straightforward manner, Mahadevan suggests that music can be categorized into two distinct groups: good music and bad music. However, the ambiguity lies in the subjectivity of these categories. What defines "good" or "bad" music? Does it come down to technical proficiency, emotional impact, popularity, or a combination of various factors? Ultimately, the answer lies within the ears and hearts of the listeners themselves. Each person brings their unique set of experiences, cultural backgrounds, and personal preferences to the table, shaping their understanding of what resonates with them.Now, let's delve into the unexpected philosophical concept that can shed new light on Mahadevan's quote. Imagine a world where there is only one category of music, universally agreed upon as "good." In this hypothetical scenario, the richness, diversity, and innovation that arise from different musical genres and ideas would cease to exist. Without variance in musical expression, we would lose the opportunity to explore alternative sonic landscapes, different cultural traditions, and the evolution of artistic experimentation. In essence, this imaginary world would be akin to living in a musical monoculture, devoid of the colorful tapestry that contributes to the vast realm of human creativity.Contrastingly, the co-existence of "good" and "bad" music, as Mahadevan suggests, allows for a multitude of musical narratives to flourish. It emphasizes that what might resonate with one person as a masterpiece could be deemed incomprehensible or unappealing to another. This divergence of opinions fosters dialogue and encourages artists to push boundaries and experiment with their craft. It propels us towards innovation, as musicians and composers continuously strive to create new sounds and styles to capture the ever-evolving spirit of their time.Furthermore, the quote invites us to reflect upon the interconnectedness of all forms of creative expression. Just as in music, other art forms such as visual arts, literature, and cinema are also intrinsically subjective. Paintings, stories, and films that resonate with one person may leave another unimpressed. The continuous coexistence of differing opinions and diverse expression cultivates a fertile ground for creativity to thrive. It opens up avenues for exploration and allows artists to challenge societal norms, provoke thought, and create transformative experiences.In conclusion, Shankar Mahadevan's quote, "There are two kinds of music: good music and bad music. Both are and will continue to co-exist," encapsulates the subjective nature of music appreciation while inviting us to ponder the deeper philosophical implications. It encourages us to embrace the diversity and richness that arises from differing tastes and perspectives. By recognizing that the world of music is vast and multifaceted, we celebrate the boundless creativity that human beings possess. So, let us relish the coexistence of "good" and "bad" music, for it is within this paradoxical tapestry that the true beauty and spirit of artistic expression reside.