Joseph Tito: 'I always wrote with some kind of angle of ignorance. I didn't know what was right or wrong.'

I always wrote with some kind of angle of ignorance. I didn't know what was right or wrong.

The quote by Joseph Tito - "I always wrote with some kind of angle of ignorance. I didn't know what was right or wrong" - holds a profound meaning. Tito's words are a reflection of his unique perspective on the act of writing, where he purposefully embraced a lack of knowledge about what was deemed right or wrong. This approach injects an element of curiosity and spontaneity into the creative process, allowing for a certain freedom of thought and expression.Tito's quote strikes at the heart of an essential question that writers, artists, and thinkers have grappled with throughout history - the notion of certainty versus uncertainty. In a world dominated by rules, norms, and expectations, Tito's angle of ignorance challenges traditional assumptions about knowledge and expertise, suggesting that sometimes letting go of preconceived notions can open up new creative possibilities.By writing from a place of ignorance, Tito willingly stepped into uncharted territory, unburdened by the weight of supposed correctness. In doing so, he liberated himself from the constraints of a right or wrong dichotomy and allowed his imagination to roam freely. This concept challenges the notion of expertise and begs the question: Can knowledge sometimes hinder creativity?In the realm of philosophy, there is a similar concept: the philosophy of uncertainty. This philosophy emphasizes the importance of questioning and challenging established beliefs, ultimately leading to a more nuanced understanding of the world. The philosophy of uncertainty aligns with Tito's approach to writing, as both invite exploration, experimentation, and a rejection of the idea that there is a definitive right or wrong.However, it is crucial to recognize that Tito's angle of ignorance does not imply a lack of knowledge or understanding. It is not an excuse to write without purpose or to disregard the essence of meaningful communication. Instead, Tito's quote highlights the importance of balancing knowledge and ignorance, leveraging both to engage in a more meaningful creative process.In contrast, some argue that a writer's responsibility lies in conducting thorough research and being well-informed in order to produce accurate and thoughtful work. While this perspective has its merits, it also runs the risk of boxing creativity into predefined boundaries, stifling the potential for groundbreaking ideas.Ultimately, Tito's quote reminds us that creativity flourishes in the space between certainty and uncertainty, knowledge and ignorance. Embracing a certain degree of ignorance can lead to new insights, fresh perspectives, and innovative creations. It invites us to question existing norms, challenge our own assumptions, and dare to explore uncharted territories.In a society where knowledge is highly valued and expertise is praised, Tito's perspective serves as a powerful reminder that there is value in embracing our own ignorance. It encourages us to approach our creative endeavors with an open mind, ready to unshackle ourselves from the confines of preconceived notions and explore the depths of our imagination. By relinquishing our attachments to right or wrong, we give ourselves permission to uncover new ideas and make meaningful contributions to the creative landscape. So, let us take a page from Tito's book and may we all find the courage to embrace the power of ignorance in our creative pursuits.