Elizabeth Gilbert: 'Marriage is not simply a romantic union between two people it's also a political and economic contract of the highest order.'

Marriage is not simply a romantic union between two people it's also a political and economic contract of the highest order.

In her thought-provoking statement, Elizabeth Gilbert challenges our conventional understanding of marriage, presenting it not merely as a romantic bond but also as a political and economic contract of significant magnitude. This quote sheds light on the multifaceted nature of marriage, implying that it holds far-reaching implications beyond the realm of love and companionship. While the traditional view of marriage often romanticizes the union and emphasizes the emotional connection between two individuals, Gilbert's perspective urges us to consider the intricate complexities that lie beneath the surface.Marriage, as a political contract, suggests that it involves the negotiation and establishment of power dynamics within the relationship. By entering into this union, individuals form a partnership that extends beyond the personal sphere, impacting both the private and public realms. The agreement to marry implies a mutual consent to share responsibilities, rights, and obligations, often consolidating resources and social status. Thus, marriage acts as a mechanism to navigate the intricacies of power distribution, attempting to find a balance between the partners' individual aspirations and the collective goals of their union.Furthermore, Gilbert's assertion that marriage is an economic contract reinforces the idea that it involves the pooling and management of resources. The merging of financial assets and property allows for the formation of a shared economic foundation within the marital bond. It introduces economic stability, jointly invested interests, and facilitates the pursuit of common objectives. Moreover, marriage often involves financial agreements, such as prenuptial or postnuptial contracts, to safeguard individual interests and protect the assets acquired during the marriage. By acknowledging the economic dimension of marriage, Gilbert brings attention to the pragmatic considerations that underpin this institution.While Gilbert's quote prompts us to contemplate the political and economic dimensions of marriage, it also invites us to explore a philosophical concept that disrupts the conventional understanding of this union. Beyond its practical implications, marriage can be seen as a form of collaboration between two individuals in their pursuit of self-actualization and personal growth. Drawing upon the philosophy of existentialism, we can view marriage as an opportunity for partners to support each other's individual journeys while also nurturing the shared endeavor of the relationship.When seen through the lens of existentialism, marriage becomes a platform for self-discovery and self-creation. Each partner retains their unique identity and remains responsible for their own existence, yet simultaneously engages in a project of shared meaning. The marriage, in this context, transcends the societal norms and expectations associated with it, allowing partners the freedom to explore their individual aspirations while cherishing the bonds they have forged together. It becomes a space where personal fulfillment and interpersonal connection coexist harmoniously.In essence, Gilbert's quote compels us to reconsider the foundations of marriage and look beyond its romantic facade. By highlighting the political and economic dimensions of this institution, she prompts us to explore the intricate power dynamics and practical considerations that underpin it. Moreover, by introducing the concept of existential collaboration, she challenges us to perceive marriage as an opportunity for personal growth and fulfillment within a shared journey. By broadening our understanding of marriage, Gilbert expands our perspective, inviting us to reflect on the potential for deeper connection and self-realization within this social and emotional bond.