Abraham Lincoln: 'These men ask for just the same thing, fairness, and fairness only. This, so far as in my power, they, and all others, shall have.'

These men ask for just the same thing, fairness, and fairness only. This, so far as in my power, they, and all others, shall have.

In Abraham Lincoln's quote, he emphasizes the importance of fairness for all individuals. He asserts that people merely desire to be treated fairly, without any bias or prejudice. Lincoln pledges to do everything in his power to ensure that this principle of fairness is extended to everyone, regardless of their background or circumstances. This quote encapsulates Lincoln's commitment to equality, justice, and the rights of every individual.Now, let's introduce a philosophical concept to add interest and depth to the article. Let's explore the idea of fairness in the context of John Rawls' theory of justice as fairness. Rawls argues that a just society is one that seeks to maximize the well-being of the least advantaged members. This concept, known as the "veil of ignorance," suggests that fairness is achieved by making decisions about the structure of society without prior knowledge of one's own position or status within it.Comparing Lincoln's quote with Rawls' theory of justice as fairness, we can see some similarities and differences. Both emphasize the importance of fairness as a fundamental principle. Lincoln's focus is on fairness in the allocation of rights and privileges, while Rawls extends it to encompass the broader socio-economic inequalities present in society.Moreover, Lincoln's quote implies that fairness should be granted to all individuals without any exceptions, while Rawls' theory acknowledges the need for certain inequalities as long as they benefit the least advantaged. This raises an interesting question: Can a society truly achieve absolute fairness, or are there inherent trade-offs and complexities involved?While it may seem paradoxical to associate the concept of fairness with the existence of inequalities, Rawls argues that these inequalities are permissible if they lead to a more equitable society overall. By prioritizing the well-being of the most disadvantaged, Rawls' theory challenges us to reconsider our traditional notions of fairness.Lincoln's quote, on the other hand, seems to advocate for an absolute idea of fairness that transcends any trade-offs. It suggests that fairness should be an inherent and indispensible part of every decision and action.In conclusion, Lincoln's quote underscores the importance of fairness for all individuals, while Rawls' theory of justice as fairness adds a layer of complexity to this concept. By introducing the idea of trade-offs and the prioritization of the least advantaged, Rawls challenges our understanding of fairness. Exploring these two perspectives allows us to delve deeper into the complex nature of fairness and its implications for societies. Ultimately, whether we strive for Lincoln's absolute fairness or adopt Rawls' theory, our pursuit of a fair society should be grounded in a commitment to equality, justice, and the well-being of all individuals.