Why did Ned not want to kill Daenerys?

The world of Westeros in HBO’s monumental series, “Game of Thrones,” is rife with intrigue, alliances, betrayals, and power plays. The show's intricacies often give rise to several complex questions that viewers are left grappling with. One such question that consistently generates lively debate is the motivation behind Eddard Stark's arresting Tyrion Lannister in the show's inaugural season. On the surface, this appears to be a clear-cut case of Stark pursuing justice for his family. However, when we delve deeper into the underpinnings of his decision, a much more layered picture begins to emerge.

Eddard Stark, known as Ned, is defined by his sense of honor and duty. To many, his decision to arrest Tyrion is merely an extension of his moral code: Tyrion stands accused of the attempted murder of Bran Stark, Ned's son, which provides sufficient motive for his actions. However, it is essential to recall that the evidence against Tyrion, a distinctive Valyrian steel dagger, is purely circumstantial, lacking direct proof.

Was Ned's decision entirely based on his unwavering desire for justice? If so, why was he quick to accept Petyr Baelish's (Littlefinger) account that the dagger belonged to Tyrion, when he knew of Littlefinger's deceitful nature? Moreover, Ned also knew that Tyrion was no fool. Why would the cunning Lannister, renowned for his intellect, use a weapon that could be traced back to him?

These questions lead us to ponder the existence of deeper, perhaps more subconscious, motivations driving Ned's actions. We cannot overlook the historical tension between the Starks and the Lannisters. From the time Jaime Lannister, Tyrion's brother, stabbed Ned's mentor and King, Aerys Targaryen in the back, a deep-seated animosity has existed between the two houses. Could this enduring animosity have colored Ned's perception, leading him to presume Tyrion's guilt prematurely?

Furthermore, Ned’s decision to arrest Tyrion occurred during his investigation into Jon Arryn’s death, the Hand of the King, and his predecessor. Ned had begun to uncover the Lannisters' numerous deceitful activities, including the possibility of an illegitimate heir to the throne. Could his arrest of Tyrion have been a strategic move, intending to unsettle the Lannisters and disrupt their machinations?

Yet another perspective is the influence of Ned's wife, Catelyn Stark. Catelyn had already seized Tyrion, believing him guilty of orchestrating Bran's fall. Ned is aware that releasing Tyrion could endanger his wife, who would bear the wrath of the powerful Lannister family. This brings us to question whether Ned's decision was influenced by personal factors—protecting his wife and maintaining unity within his family—as much as it was by political motivations or his quest for justice.

We must also consider the role that honor and reputation play in Ned's decision. As the Hand of the King and the Warden of the North, Ned carries a considerable responsibility. Releasing Tyrion without a proper investigation would be seen as a sign of weakness, something that could undermine his authority and embolden his enemies. Did Ned arrest Tyrion to maintain his own honor and that of House Stark?

While it may be tempting to see Ned's actions as being driven purely by his moral compass, a deeper exploration reveals a complex interplay of personal, political, and historical factors that shaped this critical turning point in the narrative of "Game of Thrones."

While the truth of Ned Stark's motivation may remain ambiguous, this exploration emphasizes the multifaceted nature of the characters in "Game of Thrones" and underscores the brilliance of its storytelling. It is this complexity, the blending of personal motives with overarching political strategies, and the interplay of the past and the present, that makes "Game of Thrones" an epic tale of power and human nature.

For now, we must content ourselves with speculations, as the game of thrones plays on, and the motivations of its key players remain shrouded in intrigue.