Why didn’t Roman vote in the no confidence vote?

Table of Contents

In the sprawling, often chaotic world of "Succession," few episodes have captured the attention of viewers quite like the infamous "Who's side are you on?". Why, you ask? Well, it's simple: the entire fate of Waystar Royco, the fictional media behemoth, hung in the balance, teetering precariously on the edge of a vote. This wasn't your garden-variety boardroom vote, oh no. This was a vote of "no confidence" against the patriarch of the Roy family, Logan Roy. This was a vote that could topple an empire, unseat a king, and send shockwaves through the world of corporate media. Or it could have, if Roman Roy, the snarky, emotionally scarred youngest son of Logan, had decided to actually, you know, vote.

I. Rational and Strategic Factors

Now, let's get into the meat of it. To appreciate the full weight of Roman's decision (or lack thereof), we need to understand the boardroom dynamics at play. It's like a game of chess, except instead of pawns and knights, you've got billionaire media moguls and their power-hungry offspring. And every move matters. In this case, Roman's move was not to move at all. This was a decision that wasn't just about family loyalty or a refusal to pick sides. It was about survival, power, and strategy.

The vote was a stark choice between supporting his ailing father, whose leadership was causing the stock to nosedive faster than a falcon chasing its lunch, or siding with his sibling Kendall, who was leading the charge against dear old dad. Each option presented its own risks and rewards, and Roman, being the shrewd yet slippery character that he is, decided to simply not decide​1​.

Consider the implications: a vote against Logan, if unsuccessful, could have meant professional suicide. On the other hand, a vote in Logan's favor could have been seen as an endorsement of the very leadership that was sinking the company. It was a lose-lose situation. But by abstaining, Roman managed to maintain his strategic position without explicitly aligning himself with either camp.

But it wasn't just about Roman's position on the board. Let's not forget the wider context. The company's stock was plummeting. Logan's health was deteriorating. The leadership was in disarray. It was the perfect storm, a corporate Shakespearean drama, if you will, and Roman was caught right in the middle of it​2​​3​.

In such uncertain times, an abstention could be seen as a rational choice, a form of self-preservation amid the chaos. After all, why play a high-stakes game when the rules are constantly changing and the players are willing to do anything to win? Roman, for all his crass humor and seemingly careless demeanor, proved himself to be a strategic player in the game of corporate politics. And in doing so, he left us all wondering, what will he do next?

II. Deeper Psychological Factors

But let’s not fall into the trap of believing this is all a grand game of corporate chess, bereft of human emotion. Oh no, dear readers, for beneath the business bravado, the stock prices, and the power plays, lies a tangle of psychological threads that make up the complex tapestry of Roman Roy.

And what a tapestry it is! Picture, if you will, a lovable jerk, an empathetic slime puppy, a sensitive soul wrapped in a prickly exterior, and a traumatized child masquerading as a mogul. This is Roman Roy. At first glance, he seems to be the most cynical, the most outrageous, the least likely to show a shred of human decency. But dig a little deeper, and you start to see a completely different picture​1​.

Our dear Roman isn't just the class clown of the Roy family. He's the most sensitive sibling, and arguably the most pained. He's been beaten, both metaphorically and literally, by his father for perceived slights as trivial as ordering lobster. He's been sent off to military school as a punishment, a not-so-subtle message from Logan to toughen up. He's been dismissed, derided, and discounted, leading him to develop a persona that serves as a shield against the emotional onslaught. He's the dog who keeps getting kicked, but always comes running back, a testament to his need for approval, love, and acceptance from a father who doles them out sparingly​2​.

Roman's decision to abstain from the vote isn't just a strategic move. It's a manifestation of his deep-seated psychological complexities. It’s a tug-of-war between his desire to assert his power and his instinct to protect himself from further emotional damage. And it's a reflection of his inability to sever the emotional ties that bind him to his family, despite the pain they cause him.

So, what do we make of all this? How do we reconcile the Roman who is strategic and calculating with the Roman who is emotionally scarred and constantly seeking validation?

Well, dear readers, therein lies the beauty of "Succession," and the complexity of Roman Roy. His decision to abstain from the vote is a delicate dance between rationality and emotion, between strategy and psychology. It's a decision that carries with it the weight of a troubled past, the complexity of family dynamics, and the realities of corporate politics.

In the end, Roman's decision not to vote isn't just about the fate of Waystar Royco. It's about Roman himself – his growth, his struggles, his journey. It's about the deeply human, deeply flawed, deeply fascinating character that he is. And as we continue to watch this saga unfold, one thing is clear: Roman Roy is not just a character in a TV show. He's a case study in the complexities of human nature, the intersection of business and psychology, and the enduring power of family ties – for better or worse.

So, stick around, folks. This ride isn’t over yet. In fact, I daresay it’s just beginning. Grab your popcorn, and let's see where this journey takes us next.