Ahsoka: Why did - General Syndulla is accused of bending rules?

In the TV show Ahsoka, General Syndulla, a respected and experienced leader, finds herself accused of bending rules and ignoring orders during a Senate hearing. The incidents on Seatos and Mandalore, where General Syndulla was involved, are called into question, with Senator Xiono denying any coordination with the Imperial Remnant. This accusation leads to a motion to court-martial General Syndulla for disobeying a direct order.However, the situation takes a turn when a droid representing Senator Leia Organa presents a data transcript revealing that Senator Organa had actually approved General Syndulla's mission without Senator Xiono's knowledge. Despite objections from the court regarding evidence from a droid, Senator Organa stands by the evidence, leading to the case against General Syndulla being dismissed. Chancellor Mon Mothma then invites Senator Xiono to address his further concerns directly with her.The accusation of General Syndulla bending rules raises important questions about the nature of leadership and the complexities of decision-making in times of conflict. It is crucial to analyze the reasons behind these allegations and understand if General Syndulla's actions were justified or if they indeed crossed ethical boundaries.One possible explanation for General Syndulla's alleged bending of rules could be her commitment to protecting her people and achieving the best outcome in challenging circumstances. In times of war and rebellion, leaders often find themselves faced with difficult choices where they must weigh the potential consequences and make tough decisions for the greater good. General Syndulla's actions might have been driven by a desire to achieve victory and safeguard the lives of her forces.Furthermore, General Syndulla's reputation as a skilled and respected leader might have contributed to the accusations against her. When individuals hold positions of power and influence, there will always be scrutiny and expectations of adherence to rules and regulations. However, this increased scrutiny can sometimes lead to politically motivated attacks and attempts to discredit leaders based on personal vendettas or differences in ideology.The revelation that Senator Organa approved General Syndulla's mission without Senator Xiono's knowledge adds another layer of complexity to the accusation. It raises questions about the transparency and accountability within the political system. Was General Syndulla truly bending rules, or did the issue arise from miscommunication and lack of coordination within the Senate? The dismissal of the case against General Syndulla based on the evidence presented by a droid also highlights the challenges of accepting non-human sources of information in politically charged environments.This incident involving General Syndulla brings to light the broader issues of corruption and manipulation within politics during times of conflict. As war rages on, leaders must navigate a complex landscape of rival factions, differing interests, and hidden agendas. The accusation against General Syndulla might have been the result of political maneuvering, aimed at discrediting her reputation and sowing discord within the rebel forces.In conclusion, the accusation against General Syndulla of bending rules exposes the complexities of leadership in times of conflict. The decision to bend or even break rules can sometimes be driven by the need to protect one's people, achieve victory, and navigate a hostile environment. However, accusations of bending rules can also be politically motivated and result from miscommunication or lack of transparency within the political system. As viewers, it is crucial to critically analyze the motivations and implications behind such accusations, taking into account the larger context of war and rebellion.